Using the same example with a life expectancy of nine years and if a replacement carpet of similar quality would cost 2 000 the landlord could properly charge only 222 22 for only one years worth of life use that would have.
Charge tenant for carpet replacement.
One of the most common and fairest ways to calculate a tenant s responsibility is to charge the tenant for a portion of the total costs of replacing the carpet based off how much the carpet is damaged the carpet s life expectancy and how many years taken off the total life expectancy by the damage.
According to california law landlords can only charge tenants for carpet and paint under certain conditions.
In this case the landlord should split the cost charging the tenant a fair cost for the repair but paying for the rest of the replacement charge.
What is the reasonable life expectancy of the carpet carpet which apparently was already 6 years old.
Once you learn whether or not you as a long term tenant will pay those costs you can.
If the new carpet cost 1 000 and they lived there for one year they owe 800.
However you can only charge the depreciated cost of the carpet and there is the rub.
Yes you certainly can charge the ex tenant reasonable repair replacement costs.
Carpet replacement is one of the most common problems tenants face with their security deposit.
The landlord should properly charge only 200 for the two years worth of life use that would have remained if the tenant had not damaged the carpet.
1 000 expected life of carpet.
Original cost of carpet.
In disputes over security deposits courts have often considered basic carpet cleaning to be part of normal wear and tear.
In most cases landlords should not charge tenants for a standard carpet cleaning.
If it was new when the resident moved in they pay to replace all of it.
Figure the cost based on a 5 year lifespan for the carpet.
The way to do this is to ask for quotes for removing the stain from two or three cleaning firms and charging the tenant the cheapest.